Dear Mr. Krovina,
Once again, you have posted your response, claimed that the relevant information was already provided through emails and private messages, and then closed the discussion, leaving me unable to respond.
Closing a discussion after posting your own response does not mean that the matter has been resolved.
In your latest statement, you claimed that you had already addressed the issues I raised through private messages and emails.
I would like to know exactly which responses you are referring to.
Are you referring to the message in which you accused me of “blackmailing us with false information”?
Or are you referring to the subsequent message in which you described me as a valued supporter and invited me to pursue Liberland citizenship, which would require a further payment?
Are these the explanations you claim to have provided?
Because neither of these messages addresses the actual substance of my complaint.
I paid for an E-Residency card that I never received. My delivery address was in Germany, yet the tracking number provided to me showed delivery in Portugal.
To date, I have not received documentation establishing that this tracking number actually belongs to my E-Residency card.
I was also informed that a shipment had been returned to the sender, but I have not received any tracking number or documentation identifying that alleged return.
Furthermore, you publicly accused me of blackmailing you with false information. This is a serious allegation affecting my character and reputation.
I have not received any evidence substantiating that accusation.
Instead of addressing these fundamental issues, you repeatedly refer to previous communications and close discussions after posting your own statements.
Closing a forum topic does not resolve a complaint. Suspending an account does not establish that the complaint was unfounded. And repeating an accusation does not make it true.
Let me also make something perfectly clear.
If necessary, I am prepared to publish the relevant parts of my correspondence, together with supporting documents, while respecting applicable privacy laws and the rights of others.
I am willing to stand behind my statements and the evidence supporting them.
Mr. Krovina, are you equally prepared to substantiate the statements and serious accusations you have made against me?
I have preserved the relevant correspondence, payment records, tracking information, and forum communications.
I have no objection to having these matters independently examined through the appropriate legal procedures.
The law is available to both of us. You have the right to defend your statements, just as I have the right to defend my reputation.
This matter is no longer simply about the cost of an E-Residency card. It concerns accountability, the handling of a legitimate complaint, and the serious accusations made against me.
I am not asking for special treatment, nor am I interested in an endless exchange of messages that avoids the central issues.
You may close another discussion, Mr. Krovina, but closing a discussion does not erase the documented history of what has happened.
The facts, the correspondence, and the relevant records remain available for independent examination.
Sincerely