Dear Liberlanders,
I recently worked on the following question: can AI be judge, for a court?
Liberland authorises explicitly the use of private judges, so there is a legal framework to allow this. I have to admit I am not fully clear on the Judge App thing, but this is the concept.
Also, as far as I understand, AI is listed as allowed.
Also, I think LLMs are now powerful enough in terms of reasoning and in terms of tooling to deliver this service (RAG, file search). Obviously, the digital-native legal infrastructure of Liberland also helps!
So now is the moment for a proof of concept.
In the repo https://github.com/Dessoul/ia-court you will find all the requirements to run a court with 3 AI judges. It is using Claude Code out of the box, but you can run it on any LLM.
This is a bit the goal of having 3 judges that need to agree together: they can be different LLMs, or LLMs with different roles (one can be systematically skeptical, the devil’s advocate, etc.).
This is an iterative process in which the judges have to finally agree on the verdict. They can ask questions to the different parties of the trial.
In the repo you will also find some propositions of cases, that are synthetic, AI-made of course. Side note: this is very funny how AI created fake names like DanubTech and stuff 
They are business-related cases, as it seems logical to me that they are the best candidates for first tests.
I would be happy to help you test it if you need any help; or provide more information on how it is supposed to work and the detail of the process to coordinate the different judges while giving them autonomy.
I am also very interested to get your feedback to improve this tool, to move from PoC to MVP. If you have a real low-stakes dispute where both parties consent, I’d love to try it too.